<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10000 Hours, Hits and Experts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.steffanantonas.com/10000-hours-hits-and-experts.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/10000-hours-hits-and-experts.htm</link>
	<description>A Blog on Community, Design and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:02:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pirsey</title>
		<link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/10000-hours-hits-and-experts.htm/comment-page-1#comment-572</link>
		<dc:creator>Pirsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.steffanantonas.com/?p=168#comment-572</guid>
		<description>My friend on Orkut shared this link with me and I&#039;m not dissapointed   that I came here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend on Orkut shared this link with me and I&#8217;m not dissapointed   that I came here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyrell Prince</title>
		<link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/10000-hours-hits-and-experts.htm/comment-page-1#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyrell Prince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.steffanantonas.com/?p=168#comment-326</guid>
		<description>i luv miley she?ssooooooooooooooo coooooooooooooooooooooool !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i luv miley she?ssooooooooooooooo coooooooooooooooooooooool !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Magical 10k Hours &#124; Elastic Life</title>
		<link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/10000-hours-hits-and-experts.htm/comment-page-1#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>The Magical 10k Hours &#124; Elastic Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.steffanantonas.com/?p=168#comment-121</guid>
		<description>[...] 10000 Hours, Hits and Experts (steffanantonas.com)    addthis_url = &#039;http%3A%2F%2Fwww.elasticlife.net%2Fthe-magical-10k-hours&#039;; addthis_title = &#039;The+Magical+10k+Hours&#039;; addthis_pub = &#039;&#039;; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 10000 Hours, Hits and Experts (steffanantonas.com)    addthis_url = &#8216;http%3A%2F%2Fwww.elasticlife.net%2Fthe-magical-10k-hours&#8217;; addthis_title = &#8216;The+Magical+10k+Hours&#8217;; addthis_pub = &#8221;; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexSchleber</title>
		<link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/10000-hours-hits-and-experts.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2736</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexSchleber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.steffanantonas.com/?p=168#comment-2736</guid>
		<description>Good post. I agree with your assessment Steffan, Godin appears to be making a somewhat sophist distinction here (I&#039;ve seen a few comments from him on blogs around the Web where he did the same thing, being contrarian for its own sake).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The 80/20 Principle teaches us that 20% of the effort will get 80% of the results, while the last 20% (roughly of course) of results, i.e. true mastery/expertise, will take 80% of the effort. E.g. anyone can learn to play baseball to a passable level, but in order to be in the Majors you have to devote all of your time, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What Godin is therefore right about is the question if the striving for mastery is always worth it, given that 80% or better of the result can be had more cheaply (and there are plenty of people who would say that it isn&#039;t). Then of course, he also wrote in &quot;The Dip&quot; that it is the perseverance of getting through the midpoint or further of the tough 80% of effort that will make the difference, and that the rewards tend to be massively disproportional at that end of the spectrum (to stay with the baseball example, between making near $0 with baseball, and making millions in the Major League).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. I agree with your assessment Steffan, Godin appears to be making a somewhat sophist distinction here (I&#39;ve seen a few comments from him on blogs around the Web where he did the same thing, being contrarian for its own sake).</p>
<p>The 80/20 Principle teaches us that 20% of the effort will get 80% of the results, while the last 20% (roughly of course) of results, i.e. true mastery/expertise, will take 80% of the effort. E.g. anyone can learn to play baseball to a passable level, but in order to be in the Majors you have to devote all of your time, etc.</p>
<p>What Godin is therefore right about is the question if the striving for mastery is always worth it, given that 80% or better of the result can be had more cheaply (and there are plenty of people who would say that it isn&#39;t). Then of course, he also wrote in &#8220;The Dip&#8221; that it is the perseverance of getting through the midpoint or further of the tough 80% of effort that will make the difference, and that the rewards tend to be massively disproportional at that end of the spectrum (to stay with the baseball example, between making near $0 with baseball, and making millions in the Major League).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steffan Antonas</title>
		<link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/10000-hours-hits-and-experts.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2737</link>
		<dc:creator>Steffan Antonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.steffanantonas.com/?p=168#comment-2737</guid>
		<description>@Alex - I think you&#039;re absolutely right, and he does actually refer to the&lt;br&gt;dip in his post. I always appreciate Seth&#039;s analysis, and I think that he&lt;br&gt;was right to make the point. Outliers does actually magically &quot;leave out&quot;&lt;br&gt;the destinction between hits and experts under the general umbrella of&lt;br&gt;&quot;success&quot;, which is why Seth made the point. I was really just riffing.&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the insightful comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alex &#8211; I think you&#39;re absolutely right, and he does actually refer to the<br />dip in his post. I always appreciate Seth&#39;s analysis, and I think that he<br />was right to make the point. Outliers does actually magically &#8220;leave out&#8221;<br />the destinction between hits and experts under the general umbrella of<br />&#8220;success&#8221;, which is why Seth made the point. I was really just riffing.<br />Thanks for the insightful comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
