<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Status Culture &#8211; Public vs Private and Why It Matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.steffanantonas.com/status-culture-public-vs-private-and-why-it-matters.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/status-culture-public-vs-private-and-why-it-matters.htm</link>
	<description>A Blog on Community, Design and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:02:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steffan Antonas</title>
		<link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/status-culture-public-vs-private-and-why-it-matters.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2684</link>
		<dc:creator>Steffan Antonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.steffanantonas.com/?p=380#comment-2684</guid>
		<description>Mark - You&#039;re absolutely correct, and I&#039;m also really interested to see what&lt;br&gt;comes out of Faceook&#039;s (obvious) push to go public. I&#039;m sure they&#039;re&lt;br&gt;inspired by a lot of Twitter&#039;s features that are working well - everyone&#039;s&lt;br&gt;learning at this point so you can expect a significant amount of&lt;br&gt;cross-pollination of features. Exciting stuff. Thanks for an excellent&lt;br&gt;comment. I&#039;m sure this is only the beginning of a long discussion following&lt;br&gt;the private to public push.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark &#8211; You&#39;re absolutely correct, and I&#39;m also really interested to see what<br />comes out of Faceook&#39;s (obvious) push to go public. I&#39;m sure they&#39;re<br />inspired by a lot of Twitter&#39;s features that are working well &#8211; everyone&#39;s<br />learning at this point so you can expect a significant amount of<br />cross-pollination of features. Exciting stuff. Thanks for an excellent<br />comment. I&#39;m sure this is only the beginning of a long discussion following<br />the private to public push.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Gammon</title>
		<link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/status-culture-public-vs-private-and-why-it-matters.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2683</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Gammon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.steffanantonas.com/?p=380#comment-2683</guid>
		<description>Very interesting post.  I&#039;d be curious to read an update on this given all of the recent (and forthcoming) changes that Facebook is making to further emulate Twitter.  In particular the addition of @mentions/tagging that Facebook is now implementing appears intended to shift it&#039;s role as a private-strong relationship space to one that more closely resembles Twitter&#039;s publicness.  I&#039;m guessing it won&#039;t be long until the &quot;each application has their own value and particular use depending on context&quot; perspective that you, I, and many others have been applying will become less valid.  The coming months should be quite interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting post.  I&#39;d be curious to read an update on this given all of the recent (and forthcoming) changes that Facebook is making to further emulate Twitter.  In particular the addition of @mentions/tagging that Facebook is now implementing appears intended to shift it&#39;s role as a private-strong relationship space to one that more closely resembles Twitter&#39;s publicness.  I&#39;m guessing it won&#39;t be long until the &#8220;each application has their own value and particular use depending on context&#8221; perspective that you, I, and many others have been applying will become less valid.  The coming months should be quite interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steffan Antonas</title>
		<link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/status-culture-public-vs-private-and-why-it-matters.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2155</link>
		<dc:creator>Steffan Antonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.steffanantonas.com/?p=380#comment-2155</guid>
		<description>Mark - You&#039;re absolutely correct, and I&#039;m also really interested to see what&lt;br&gt;comes out of Faceook&#039;s (obvious) push to go public. I&#039;m sure they&#039;re&lt;br&gt;inspired by a lot of Twitter&#039;s features that are working well - everyone&#039;s&lt;br&gt;learning at this point so you can expect a significant amount of&lt;br&gt;cross-pollination of features. Exciting stuff. Thanks for an excellent&lt;br&gt;comment. I&#039;m sure this is only the beginning of a long discussion following&lt;br&gt;the private to public push.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark &#8211; You&#39;re absolutely correct, and I&#39;m also really interested to see what<br />comes out of Faceook&#39;s (obvious) push to go public. I&#39;m sure they&#39;re<br />inspired by a lot of Twitter&#39;s features that are working well &#8211; everyone&#39;s<br />learning at this point so you can expect a significant amount of<br />cross-pollination of features. Exciting stuff. Thanks for an excellent<br />comment. I&#39;m sure this is only the beginning of a long discussion following<br />the private to public push.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Gammon</title>
		<link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/status-culture-public-vs-private-and-why-it-matters.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2149</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Gammon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.steffanantonas.com/?p=380#comment-2149</guid>
		<description>Very interesting post.  I&#039;d be curious to read an update on this given all of the recent (and forthcoming) changes that Facebook is making to further emulate Twitter.  In particular the addition of @mentions/tagging that Facebook is now implementing appears intended to shift it&#039;s role as a private-strong relationship space to one that more closely resembles Twitter&#039;s publicness.  I&#039;m guessing it won&#039;t be long until the &quot;each application has their own value and particular use depending on context&quot; perspective that you, I, and many others have been applying will become less valid.  The coming months should be quite interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting post.  I&#39;d be curious to read an update on this given all of the recent (and forthcoming) changes that Facebook is making to further emulate Twitter.  In particular the addition of @mentions/tagging that Facebook is now implementing appears intended to shift it&#39;s role as a private-strong relationship space to one that more closely resembles Twitter&#39;s publicness.  I&#39;m guessing it won&#39;t be long until the &#8220;each application has their own value and particular use depending on context&#8221; perspective that you, I, and many others have been applying will become less valid.  The coming months should be quite interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steffan Antonas</title>
		<link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/status-culture-public-vs-private-and-why-it-matters.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2010</link>
		<dc:creator>Steffan Antonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.steffanantonas.com/?p=380#comment-2010</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the long thoughtful comment. I&#039;ve found the same satisfaction that you have in splitting my interactions on various social networks (Status and personal stuff on facebook, information sharing on Twitter and real-time conversations and group tracking on Friendfeed). Each one is good for a different thing and the context matters. I&#039;m glad to see you agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the long thoughtful comment. I&#39;ve found the same satisfaction that you have in splitting my interactions on various social networks (Status and personal stuff on facebook, information sharing on Twitter and real-time conversations and group tracking on Friendfeed). Each one is good for a different thing and the context matters. I&#39;m glad to see you agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
